- #How many soldiers in beyond the horizon 2017 full
- #How many soldiers in beyond the horizon 2017 plus
That is a serious consideration perhaps the most important for Army leaders to contemplate. Obviously, a transition to the heavier 7.62 cartridge means a reduction in the basic load of the Soldier, to just under half of the current 210 rounds.
#How many soldiers in beyond the horizon 2017 full
In order to take full advantage of the range of the 7.62 cartridge, the current draft requirement for the IBR calls for a 1×6 variable optic. Interestingly, these may well turn out to be more appropriate for use with an intermediate caliber cartridge. Additionally, the Army can leverage the latest in small arms technology such as the new short frame receivers.
![how many soldiers in beyond the horizon 2017 how many soldiers in beyond the horizon 2017](https://c8.alamy.com/comp/R6KB73/us-army-soldiers-check-local-citizens-into-a-medical-readiness-event-during-beyond-the-horizon-2017-in-san-ignacio-belize-may-15-2017-bth-2017-is-a-us-southern-command-sponsored-army-south-led-exercise-designed-to-provide-humanitarian-and-engineering-services-to-communities-in-need-demonstrating-us-support-for-belize-R6KB73.jpg)
For example, the Army can get exactly what they want, rather than adapting a weapon originally procured for another purpose. There are definite long-term advantages to this course of action. In this case they may very well issue an RFP to industry. However, the Army may evaluate these GOTS platforms and determine that none of them meet their requirement. It’s important to note that if any of one these platforms is adopted for this role, it will require some changes as mentioned above because they were all adopted for other requirements. Essentially, it would need to be “dumbed down” for general issue. Additionally, it uses a proprietary magazine. However, as a weapon system, it incorporates an expensive optic and a rather unconventional suppressor system. It utilizes a piston system which many prefer over the M110’s M4-style direct impingement gas operating system. Manufactured by H&K, it is a variant of their HK417 platform, or more specifically, an Americanized G28 sniper rifle. The final GOTS option is the newly adopted M110A1, Compact Semi-Auto Sniper System. It uses what most believe is the best of the 7.62 AR-style magazines and is considered industry standard.
#How many soldiers in beyond the horizon 2017 plus
On the plus side, it has been adopted by numerous other user groups and a multitide of variants are readily available. As a system, SASS comes with a rather expensive optic and some other accessories not for general issue. Currently in service with the Army as a Sniper weapon, it is manufactured by Knight’s Armament Co. The third option is the M110 Semi-Auto Sniper System. Finally, the Mk17 uses a proprietary magazine, adapted from the FN FAL which is less than ideal. There aren’t nearly enough in inventory so the Army would have to buy more, but that’s true of any of the GOTS options. However, the platform was adopted after a competition between 5.56 weapons and was not evaluated for adoption against other weapons in its 7.62 configuration. This makes it very attractive for a planned transition to a new cartridge. Built by FN, and designed to meet USSOCOM’s SOF Combat Assault Rifle requirement, it is a modular platform with a simple swap from one caliber to another. However, it did validate the need for a 7.62 rifle option. Brought back into limited service during the early years of the war, it suffers from numerous shortcomings. This option, isn’t even really an option. There are currently four options, although the first one I’ll mention hasn’t even been discussed.įirst up is the M14 Enhanced Battle Rifle. It means less oversight and is quicker to put in action. The path of least resistance may well be to adopt an existing 7.62mm Government Off The Shelf (GOTS) weapon. Such a transition is all-but-impossible with the current 5.56 receiver sets. Additionally, the transition to this proposed intermediate caliber cartridge is possible from a 7.62 platform. The idea is to adopt the Battle Rifle to deal with a newly identified threat with what’s available now, and transition the fleet to an intermediate caliber cartridge, once its selected. That’s why they want to adopt 7.62mm now. Unfortunately, the US Army doesn’t plan to conduct an intermediate caliber study until the early 2020s. 277 USA are developments of the Army Marksmanship Unit. Currently, elements of the Army are evaluating. The “Interim” component of this capability’s name relies on a plan to eventually adopt one of the 6.5mm family of intermediate calibers. It’s important to establish right up front that 7.62mm is not the Army’s end goal. The goal here is to foster a dialogue about the 7.62 requirement in general, and not offer operational specifics. Although at this point, I’ll keep that exact exact distance close to the vest. The 7.62x54R cartridge gives the enemy those longer arms.Ĭonsequently, the Army wants to enable the rifleman to accurately engage targets at a further range than the current 5.56mm. The troops feel like they’re in a street fight with a guy with longer arms. The genesis of this requirement is overmatch.
![how many soldiers in beyond the horizon 2017 how many soldiers in beyond the horizon 2017](https://c8.alamy.com/comp/J22GMR/soldiers-with-the-808th-engineer-company-and-belize-defense-force-J22GMR.jpg)
According to multiple sources, what started out as a directed requirement for a 7.62 NATO Designated Marksmanship Rifle for issue to Infantry Rifle Squads has grown in scope to increase the Basis of Issue to all personnel in Brigade Combat Teams and perhaps beyond.